A12Bionic- og Snapdragon 855-processorer er baseret på 64-bit mikroarkitekturen og fremstillet gennem 7nm-fremstillingsprocessen. En mindre procesknude øger den samlede ydelse og effektiviteten af chipsættet. Det er den eneste lighed mellem begge processorer.
Comparisonof the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ on one side and the Apple A12 Bionic on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.0GHz.
AppleA13 Bionic. Apple A12 Bionic. Snapdragon 855 Plus. CPU. Hexa-core CPUs, with two high-performance cores and four power-efficient cores. 20% faster CPU speed and 30% more power efficiency over the A12’s CPU. Hexa-core CPUs, with two high-performance cores and four power-efficient cores. Qualcomm Kryo 485 CPU, Octa-core CPU.
Hemoscomparado las caracterĂsticas del Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus y el Apple A12 Bionic y hemos elaborado una lista de beneficios y una tabla comparativa para usted. Descubra cuál elegir en 2022. Beneficios de Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus. Ganador en
Además A12 Bionic es más eficiente en el consumo de energĂa y consume menos energĂa. A diferencia de la implementaciĂłn de CPU de 6 nĂşcleos del A12, el Snapdragon 855 tiene una configuraciĂłn de 8 nĂşcleos. Qualcomm ha optado por una disposiciĂłn de tres conglomerados, en lugar de la disposiciĂłn normal de dos conglomerados.
Search A14 Bionic Benchmark. The CPU on A14 Bionic is a six-core CPU with 4 high-efficiency cores and 2-high performance cores In the leaked benchmark results, this Samsung SoC was compared to Apple's current flagship the iPhone 12 Pro that packs Apple's A14 Bionic, one of the fastest SoC's in a phone on sale today The phone also offers support
. VS We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Adreno 650 with the older 6-core Apple A12 Bionic Apple A12 Bionic GPU SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments 4 Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Performs better in floating-point computationsHas 2 more coresSupports 29% higher memory bandwidth 44 against GB/sAnnounced 1-year and 3-months laterShows better up to 24% AnTuTu 9 score – 659K vs 531K14% higher CPU clock speed 2840 vs 2490 MHz Pros of Apple A12 Bionic Higher GPU frequency ~92%Better instruction set architecture Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 185438 127267 GPU 217870 196436 Memory 117733 99161 UX 136946 104297 Total score 659824 531765 AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores. Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s 745 Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 91% 69% Graphics test 23 FPS 31 FPS Score 3874 5218 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile 60 FPS [Ultra] - Call of Duty Mobile 61 FPS [Ultra] - Fortnite 30 FPS [Ultra] - World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS [Ultra] - Genshin Impact 60 FPS [Ultra] - Mobile Legends Bang Bang 59 FPS [Ultra] - Device Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 1080 x 2340 - We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 865 and A12 Bionic CPU Architecture 1x GHz – Kryo 585 Prime Cortex-A773x GHz – Kryo 585 Gold Cortex-A774x GHz – Kryo 585 Silver Cortex-A55 2x GHz – Vortex4x GHz – Tempest Cores 8 6 Frequency 2840 MHz 2490 MHz Instruction set L1 cache 512 KB 128 KB L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB L3 cache 4 MB - Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers Transistor count billion billion TDP 5 W 6 W Graphics GPU name Adreno 650 Apple A12 Bionic GPU Architecture Adreno 600 - GPU frequency 587 MHz 1125 MHz Execution units 2 4 Shading units 512 - FLOPS 1202 Gigaflops 560 Gigaflops Vulkan version - OpenCL version - DirectX version 12 - Memory Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X Memory frequency 2750 MHz 2133 MHz Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit Max bandwidth 44 Gbit/s Gbit/s Max size 16 GB 4 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Hexagon 698 Neural Engine Storage type UFS UFS NVMe Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2688 x 1242 Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS Video codecs VP8, VP9 Motion JPEG Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AAC‑LC, Apple Lossless, HE‑AAC, Linear PCM, AAX и AAX+, HE‑AAC v2, MP3 Connectivity Modem X55 Intel XMM 7560 4G support LTE Cat. 22 LTE Cat. 18 5G support Yes No Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps Upload speed Up to 3000 Mbps Up to 350 Mbps Wi-Fi 6 5 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 865 1264 53% Total votes 2384 Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of A12 Bionic and Snapdragon 865, or ask any questions Asim 18 February 2022 2340 In every aspect sdm 865 is better but when it's about real use for in games pubg the performance is better in iPhone why? I am an Android lover but, Similarly, due to IOS software optimization iPhone is beast 🔥 +79 Reply Apple is ultra smooth 04 July 2021 1603 Hard Gaming In Apple a13 chip , Don't expect from snapdragons below 800 series +42 Reply Shane smith. 13 July 2020 0152 S20 ultra has zero lag in pubg. Hell my s10 plus didn’t have any lag! +113 Reply Rahul gujjar 01 July 2020 0627 A12 bionic chip is the best , performance in pubg mobile gaming playing with 0 lag then a12 is better then snapdragon 865 ? +326 Reply Prabhat 15 February 2021 2018 Useless a12. Only because of optimization it runs smoothly +22 Reply bruh 15 March 2021 0401 Prabhat, "only because of optimization" lol salty cause the people who make snapdragon phones don't optimize it as much as apple optimizes their in house chips +15 Reply Lmao 29 March 2021 1048 bruh, Maybe in pubg because it was optimize d.. but in genshin impact bruh even the a13 can't handle the game that much not even close to the SD865 +26 Reply Dig 11 May 2021 1813 Lmao, I don't care about games for little girls. +10 Reply chiranjeet 18 August 2021 1907 Lmao, optimization in pubg cod is better in ios +15 Reply
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+
VS We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Adreno 640 with the older 6-core Apple A11 Bionic Apple GPU SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Performs better in floating-point computationsHas a smaller size transistor 7 versus 10 nmAnnounced 1-year and 3-months laterHas 2 more coresShows better up to 31% AnTuTu 9 score – 522K vs 399K19% higher CPU clock speed 2840 vs 2390 MHzBetter instruction set architecture Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 141555 126597 GPU 184296 122199 Memory 62560 65581 UX 131223 84287 Total score 522806 399113 AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores. Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection 21 images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning 48 images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s 21 images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 91% 62% Graphics test 18 FPS 18 FPS Score 3096 3146 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile 58 FPS [Ultra] - Call of Duty Mobile 56 FPS [Ultra] - Fortnite 28 FPS [Ultra] - Shadowgun Legends 51 FPS [Ultra] - World of Tanks Blitz 59 FPS [Ultra] - Mobile Legends Bang Bang 57 FPS [Ultra] - Device Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 1080 x 2340 - We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 855 and A11 Bionic CPU Architecture 1x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold3x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold4x GHz – Cortex-A55 Kryo 485 Silver 2x GHz – Monsoon4x GHz – Mistral Cores 8 6 Frequency 2840 MHz 2390 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A L1 cache 512 KB 64 KB L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB L3 cache 2 MB - Process 7 nanometers 10 nanometers Transistor count billion billion TDP 6 W 8 W Graphics GPU name Adreno 640 Apple GPU Architecture Adreno 600 - GPU frequency 585 MHz - Execution units 2 3 Shading units 384 - FLOPS 899 Gigaflops 325 Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s Gbit/s Max size 16 GB 4 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Hexagon 690 Apple M10 Storage type UFS NVMe Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2436 x 1125 Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS Video codecs VP8, VP9 Motion JPEG Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem X24 LTE, X50 5G - 4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 12 5G support Yes No Download speed Up to 5000 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps Upload speed Up to 1240 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 6 5 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 855 523 Total votes 836 Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of A11 Bionic and Snapdragon 855, or ask any questions
As 5G technology draws nearer, chipset manufacturers are doing all they can to keep up. The Snapdragon 855 is the 5G chipset by Qualcomm. It’s fitted with the latest Kryo CPU cores, 7nm nodes, and an improved version of the X24 LTE modem. It offers similar features as Apple’s A12 Bionic chipset, which is being used for the latest iPhone smartphones. It’s leading 7nm chipsets that deliver impressive graphics performances and an improved Neural Engine. Let’s see how the two processors have a 64-bit microarchitecture and they are both made using the latest 7nm nodes. These are the smallest process nodes so far and they provide improved performances and better power efficiency, but that’s all they have in A12 Bionic has six cores divided into four efficiency and two performance processors. That results in faster app launches, better efficiency, and a quicker overall response time than the predecessor. Admittedly, the difference in response times is not that the other hand, the 855 has 8 cores arranged in three clusters. The 8 Kryo 845 cores are divided into one “Prime” Cortex A76 core with a working speed of Then, we have three “Performance” Cortex-A76 cores that are working at and four “Efficiency” Cortex-A55 cores that can provide up to The arrangement provides high performance, efficiency, and better task-sharing capabilities, as well as lower latency 855’s “Prime” core is fitted with a 512KB L2 cache, while the three “Performance” cores have the 256KB L2 caches, and the four “Efficiency” cores have 128KB L2 caches. They all work together by bridging the gap between the CPU and the RAM, which means they can handle all the information without talking about GPUs, the Snapdragon 855 packs the Adreno 640 Graphic Processing Unit that offers a significant boost and supports 4k HDR10+ playback. The A12 Bionic uses the Apple-designed 4-core GPU that can cope with all games and high-resolution videos and CameraThe Snapdragon 855 has a Spectra 380 ISP onboard. It’s the first chip of its kind that incorporates a Computer Vision Engine that allows depth calculations and 60FPS videos. It can deliver real-time portrait modes and detect objects that are far away without using too much power. Those benefits are only possible because the AI is infused with the A12 uses the Apple ISP camera feature, which offers enhanced ISP, advanced algorithms, and faster sensors. The Smart HDR feature provides high-resolution photos with more highlights and shadow Intelligence has changed the game since it became a standard feature for most mid-range and high-end smartphones. The 855 uses the 4th Gen multiple core Artificial Intelligence Engine for all AI tasks the engine combines the Kryo CPU with the Hexagon 690 CPU and the Adreno GPU. The feature can handle up to 7 trillion artificial intelligence operations per second. It works together with a dedicated tensor accelerator to improve AI learning for about 3 are many advantages to the new AI engine, including super-resolution snapshots, scene detection, face authentication, text recognition, and dual camera bokeh. The AI also supports Google TensorFlow, Open Neural Network Exchange ONNX, and Facebook Caffe took a completely different approach with its 8-core Neural Engine. The AI can perform 5 trillion operations every second, which is impressive, but it’s far behind the Snapdragon 855’s performs well when it comes to face recognition and predicting your moves based on what you do, and it is also responsible for resource allocation. The AI knows how to use the resources to run algorithms on the processor, the neural engine, and the GPU, and still has some processing power to spare for other processes. Other improvements include quicker app launching, improved machine learning, and learning user Final ResultThe Snapdragon 855 and Apple A12 chipsets are quite similar. However, the Snapdragon 855 wins because it’s the first 5G-ready chipset on the market. The new technology provides a significant speed improvement, and the 855’sX24 LTE provides download speeds up to 2Gbps and uploads of 316Mbps. It also comes with the Elite gaming mode for the best gaming experience A12 Bionic is a little better at single core performance. However, it’s not 5G-ready, which will be a problem soon. We are yet to see the new generation of 5G-ready Apple you prefer the A12 Bionic or the 855? What do you think about the 5G network that will soon be available all over the world? Share your thoughts in the comment section below.
a12 bionic vs snapdragon 855
